Drones and targeted killings are back in the news these days and Dave Weigel at Slate made a great point today that..." one reason why drone warfare
and targeted killing don't really
get discussed in Washington unless there's a memo leak or a protest:
There's bipartisan consensus to whistle awkwardly and let the system
continue." I think this can't be stressed enough, legal and moral
questions aside our targeted killing policies remain remarkably popular
among Americans of a variety of political stripes and overwhelmingly
popular among our elected officials. None other than John Boehner
referred to a statement with this response to questions about the
targeted killing of American citizens: "When an individual has joined
al-Qaida — the organization responsible
for the murder of thousands of Americans — and actively plots future
attacks against U.S. citizens, soldiers, and interests around the world,
the U.S. government has both the authority and the obligation to defend
the country against that threat." That might be a dubious legal
rational, but it's a great one in the court of public opinion and given
the way the national security apparatus and presidency has evolved since
the end of World War II, that's what matters. You might not like these
policies but I don't see them going away anytime soon.
Any campaign trying to change these policies must be rooted in these political realities or it won't get far. Politics is hard work and if you want to enact change you have to go beyond calling for Obama to be impeached or saying you consider something unconstitutional, that won't change anything.
No comments:
Post a Comment