So the Pope got named Time Magazine's Person of the Year and there's a lot of talk about whether this is a "good" or "bad" choice. The choice sort of makes sense to me, the Pope is important and moving the Catholic Church away from doctrinal questions about regulating human (largely female and gay) sexuality and instead addressing things like social inequality and poverty will probably be important in the long run.
But honestly Time's list has always struck me as being pretty goofy. Sometimes they seem to try and pick "the
most important person" that year, sometimes they seem to want to pick "the person(s) we
should all try and be like", and sometimes they pick intangible patriotic
concepts for some reason like "The American Fighting Man" or "Middle
Americans." Heck they even come up with really silly ideas that aren't
really people at all like "The Computer." And some people on the list I
had to look up because I had no idea who they were like like Pierre
Laval.
Basically its a silly list that tends to grow sillier as the years go on, picking the Pope is a vote for trying to make the list less silly, but it's not like it actually matters or anything.
*****************************************************************
Over at The Good Men Project I talked about how the minimum wage will likely be a big issue in 2014 and how shows like Scandal and House of Cards gets conspiracies in politics all wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment